RJOR - Official publication of Romanian Association of Oral Rehabilitation

Str. Mihail Kogalniceanu No.2, Iasi, Romania

Janacondurache@yahoo.com

+40735523366

Romanian Journal of Oral Rehabilitation Numarul 3 COMPARISON BETWEEN CC/GNRH-ANT AND FLARE-UP GNRH AGONIST PROTOCOLS IN POOR OVARIAN RESPONDERS UNDERGOING ICSI

COMPARISON BETWEEN CC/GNRH-ANT AND FLARE-UP GNRH AGONIST PROTOCOLS IN POOR OVARIAN RESPONDERS UNDERGOING ICSI

Bosoancă Ioan Cătălin, Marin Alina-Gabriela, Vlădăreanu Radu

Abstract:

Objective: To compare the efficacy of two protocols for ovarian stimulation in patients with poor ovarian reserve during in vitro fertilization (IVF) treatment. Methods: This retrospective observational study enrolled patients with poor ovarian reserve who underwent cycles of  intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI). The patients were divided into two groups: (a) a flare-up gonadotropin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol (group A); (b) a mild stimulation protocol CC/GnRH-antagonist (group B). Demographic characteristics, clinical variables and treatment outcomes were compared between the two groups. Results: A total of 67 patients were enrolled in the study: 32 in group A and 35 in group B. Group B (20%) had a significantly higher cycle cancellation rate compared to group A (15.62%). There was no significant difference in mean age, body mass index, basal serum follicle-stimulating hormone and estradiol levels and antral follicle count. The days of stimulation, mean gonadotropin dose and oocytes retrieved and metaphase II oocytes retrieved, serum estradiol level on the day of human chorionic gonadotropin administration were significantly higher in group A. The fertilization rate and the number of embryos transferred were similar in both groups. The implantation rate was higher in the flare up group  and the total cancellation rate was higher in the GnRH antagonist/CC group, but these findings were not statistically significant. Conclusion: Although mild protocol is not superior to microdosed flare-up protocol in poor ovarian response patients, it may be used as an alternative protocol.

Loader Loading...
EAD Logo Taking too long?

Reload Reload document
| Open Open in new tab
Tags: , , ,

By continuing to use the site, you agree to the use of cookies || Prin continuarea navigarii pe acest site esti de acord cu utilizarea cookie-urilor more information || mai multe informatii

RJOR.RO utilizeaza fisiere de tip cookie pentru a personaliza si imbunatati experienta ta pe Website-ul nostru. Te informam ca ne-am actualizat politicile pentru a integra in acestea si in activitatea curenta a adre.ro cele mai recente modificari propuse de Regulamentul (UE) 2016/679 privind protectia persoanelor fizice in ceea ce priveste prelucrarea datelor cu caracter personal si privind libera circulatie a acestor date. inainte de a continua navigarea pe Website-ul nostru te rugam sa aloci timpul necesar pentru a citi si intelege continutul Politicii de Cookie. Prin continuarea navigarii pe Website-ul nostru confirmi acceptarea utilizarii fisierelor de tip cookie conform Politicii de Cookie. Nu uita totusi ca poti modifica in orice moment setarile acestor fisiere cookie urmand instructiunile din Politica de Cookie The cookie settings on this website are set to "allow cookies" to give you the best browsing experience possible. If you continue to use this website without changing your cookie settings or you click "Accept" below then you are consenting to this.

Close